An argument-based meeting format with a professional moderator provides a practical solution.
How the Meeting Works
The day begins by clearly framing the topic and defining what the meeting will focus on. The discussion remains strictly on the agreed subject, without drifting into unrelated work issues. Participants then explore arguments both in favour of and against the topic and engage in structured debates in smaller groups.
This debate format allows participants to examine the strengths and weaknesses of different perspectives, compare them with their own views, and analyse the issue in a balanced and thoughtful way.
Outcomes
In some cases, participants change their initial position after the meeting, having recognised that the opposing arguments are stronger and that the proposed change is not as problematic as first assumed. In other cases, the group reaches a shared understanding that the original idea requires further development. Often, participants retain their original stance but accept the change because they understand the reasoning behind it.
All of these are valid and meaningful outcomes. The goal of an argument-based meeting is not to force a change of opinion, but to clarify the reasons behind a change, reduce emotional tension, ensure everyone is heard, and create space for structured listening and reasoning.
After the meeting, participants have:
-
gained the arguments needed to make a well-considered decision and processed emotional responses
-
analysed key arguments for and against the topic and compared them with their personal views
-
worked through critical aspects of the issue as a team and identified areas requiring further discussion
- reached a shared understanding of how to move forward
Feedback
“I am sincerely grateful for the opportunity to observe Kai Klandorf in action. She engages deeply with the topic at a grassroots level and, when necessary, adapts the topic or debate flow to suit the audience or circumstances, while staying true to the objective of the discussion.”
“An excellent professional moderator from start to finish. The moderator supported us throughout all stages of preparation and truly became part of our team. It was especially valuable how concerns and fears among participants were addressed.”
“The entire preparation process – from concept to execution – was very well organised. The proposal was sufficiently detailed, with roles, responsibilities, and expectations clearly defined. Before the session, trainer Kaspar was proactively involved in shaping the meeting topic. Efficient communication and clear expression created complete trust. The trainers were flexible and adapted well to circumstances. I particularly value when trainers embody the principles they teach. The training was well balanced: the theoretical part provided the right foundation for the practical exercises that followed. The meeting structure helped participants identify less effective work patterns and offered new perspectives through strong examples.”
“In certain situations, using a moderator is one of the most effective solutions. It helps redirect attention and energy away from opposing positions and toward collaborative thinking and discussion of the actual topic. The moderator’s ability to accurately assess the situation and guide both the initiation and flow of discussion was clearly evident. Thorough preparatory work before the event played an important role in this success.”